Argumentative Essay Examples
An argumentative essay is a kind of academic work in which the author clearly positions herself on a contentious topic and backs it up with facts, logical arguments, and examples. Its primary objective is to persuade the reader of a specific point of view by means of factual evidence, critical thinking, and methodically presented arguments. Though they sometimes examine both sides of a problem, these pieces usually support one point of view above the others.
Why Are Examples Important for Learning?
One of the best strategies to learn how to write argumentative essays is to read actual ones. This post show how to:
- Develop a compelling thesis statement.
- Organize ideas logically and clearly.
- Use real-life experiences or facts to support arguments.
- Address counterarguments and refute them convincingly.
What will you find on this page?
- Gender Neutrality and Cultural Evolution
- Partisan vs. Nonpartisan Judge Elections
- A Cultural Plunge Experience That Challenges Biases
Perfect for students, teachers, and content creators trying to grasp the skill of persuasive writing, each example is presented in a natural, conversational way yet makes a clear point. Whether your first argumentative essay is being written or you want to hone your abilities, these models provide a useful road map.
What Makes a Strong Argumentative Essay?
A strong argumentative essay clearly positions itself on a controversial topic and backs it up with fair treatment of opposing points of view, logical analysis, and reliable data. Using samples from the three articles you have supplied, let’s investigate the main elements of good argumentative writing:
1. Clear Thesis Statement
A strong argumentative essay begins with a clear, direct thesis that tells the reader exactly what the author believes.
- In the judge election essay, the thesis is explicitly stated:
- “I am an advocate of the partisan election system…” This firmly positions the author on one side of a debate.
- In the gender neutrality essay, the main idea is established through a cultural observation:
- “Gender neutrality is becoming a new norm of emerging human societies.”
- In the cultural plunge essay, the shift in personal belief serves as the core argument:
- “We need to understand people and avoid social profiling in every case.”
2. Logical Structure
Effective essays guide readers smoothly from point to point with logical transitions.
- The gender neutrality essay starts with the historical invisibility of non-binary individuals, builds with personal stories (e.g., Joshua and Jacob), and ends with examples of corporate progress.
- The judge election essay begins by comparing partisan and nonpartisan systems, presents facts from various states, shares the author’s opinion, and concludes with a preference for partisan elections.
- The cultural plunge essay unfolds like a narrative—from misunderstanding and confrontation to realization and acceptance—while supporting a deeper argument about tolerance and coexistence.
3. Use of Evidence and Credible Sources
Argumentative writing gains strength from real examples, data, or observations.
- The judge election essay uses state-by-state comparisons (e.g., “13 states used the nonpartisan election method”) to provide factual grounding.
- The gender neutrality essay references real organizations like United Airlines and TIAA adopting inclusive policies.
- The cultural plunge essay offers firsthand experience and a shift in worldview based on personal interaction, which serves as powerful qualitative evidence.
4. Balanced Treatment of Opposing Views
Strong arguments also pay careful attention to the other side.
- The author of the gender neutrality essay notes continuing opposition:
- “But all such changes are not a norm in our popular culture and are sometimes seen as nonadjustable with values.”
- The author of the judge election essay notes both benefits and drawbacks of partisan elections when compared to other systems.
- In the cultural plunge essay the author begins with bias and fear to demonstrate personal confrontation with opposing beliefs.
5. Engaging and Formal Tone
- Tone should remain polite and clear even if style will affect it somewhat.
- All three pieces clearly express ideas using a conversational but official voice.
- The writing stays calm, serious enough for an intellectual or thoughtful audience even when addressing emotionally charged subjects like prejudice, identity, or systematic exclusion.
Argumentative Essay Example 1
Partisan and Nonpartisan Judges Election System
Introduction examples for argumentative essays
[Introduction & Background] The election of partisan and nonpartisan judges differs throughout the United States. They are opposite to one another as East is to West or North is to South. A partisan election of judges is where the candidate running for the position of judge mentions the affiliation with a political party. Whereas a nonpartisan election does not require and predominantly outlaws the display of political affiliation of the judge. [Thesis Statement] I am an advocate of the partisan election system as this discloses the political affiliation of the judge. And it helps enormously both in keeping a check on judicial transparency and accountability.
[Evidence and Comparison]
Considering the selections as of June 2021, the nonpartisan election of judges is famous in the United States compared to the partisan election. At the supreme court level, thirteen states used the nonpartisan election method, and fifteen courts used it for at least one type of lower court. However, partisan elections have a lower count than nonpartisan elections as of June 2021. At the supreme court level, there were only seven courts that adopted the partisan election criteria. And there were another seven courts that adopted this selection criterion in at least one lower court to the supreme court.
[Wider Context: Other Systems]
Other Judges’ selection systems include the Michigan-Ohio method, gubernatorial appointment method, legislative elections method, and assisted appointment. All these systems are working in different states of the country. The debate on the judge’s selection system continues to date in various sections of society, especially those who actively take part in judicial matters. There are merits and demerits of each system. The most famous system, however, as of June 2021, is the assisted appointment system, with around 22 states opting for it. The second most famous system is the nonpartisan election system, and 13 states opt for this system.
[Local Observation & Contrast]
Talking about my town, they select judges following the partisan election system. The partisan election system requires the members to disclose their political affiliation. And the political parties support the candidate in the election process. Any candidate receiving more than or equal to 50% of the votes wins the election. If no candidate secures at least 50% votes, the two candidates with the highest votes advance to a general election. In my state, they follow a nonpartisan election system. The ballot includes only the name of the judge and no political affiliation. Candidates can’t win the election based on the results of the primary election alone. The top two candidates must advance to the general election to get elected. [Argument: Why Partisan Is Better] In the partisan election system, judges perform better as they care about their voters and act like politicians. And they are also as independent as any appointed judges. Also, they write more opinions compared to the appointed ones. While appointed judges write much lesser verdicts, focus on leaving a legacy, and follow professionalism.
[Conclusion]
I think that I have no problem with the judicial system of my town. However, I would like to change the election system of my state to the partisan election system.
Analysis of Argumentative Essay Example 1
The paper offers a compelling argument in favor of the partisan election system for judges and offers a broad summary of the ways in which various judicial selection processes are applied all throughout the country. It deftly introduces the subject, clarifies the differences between partisan and nonpartisan systems, and cites state-level variances and national data. Furthermore, the author tries to create personal relevance by comparing local and state systems, therefore adding specificity and a real-world link.
The essay suffers significant flaws which reduce its potency as an argumentative work. The main point of contention is poor, credible evidence; for instance, assertions such as “judges perform better” and “write more opinions” are offered without sources or statistics, therefore undermining the case’s persuasiveness. The tone is also erratic; sentences like “I have no problem with the judicial system of my town” sound conversational and informal, therefore lessening the power of the essay. Furthermore adding little analytical value is the writing’s needless repetitiousness and hazy analogies, as equating the systems to “East and West.” Crucially, the essay ignores counterarguments or opposing points of view, which is a necessary feature of a good argumentative essay. Including and then negating different points of view will strengthen the argument. At last, the company could be better since some ideas are offered without enough justification and section transitions are abrupt.
Argumentative Essay Example 2
Gender Neutrality: A Necessary Step in Cultural Evolution
Introduction examples for argumentative essays
[Introduction & Background] Cultures evolve, and societies slowly and gradually embrace cultural changes. The role of non-binary people was close to nothing a couple of decades earlier. People who didn’t associate themselves with any gender, either male or female, and preferred to be referred to as “they,” had no identical place in society. They felt like non-inclusive beings or people whose existence had no exclusivity. [Support/Evidence] But today, gender neutrality is becoming a new norm of emerging human societies. People and organizations are adopting and actively encouraging such inclusion of these members of society. [Thesis Statement] As cultures evolve, societies must actively embrace gender neutrality to ensure inclusivity and fairness for non-binary individuals, especially in workplaces and public spaces.
[Topic Sentence – Argument 2: Personal narratives show the need for social change]
We are witnessing this change in culture where identifying oneself other than male or female is increasingly normalized. Our social structure didn’t allow this a couple of years ago. Joshua Byron, for instance, always wanted to dress like Princess Leia, but it was not culturally acceptable as he was a boy. However, he feels more comfortable today after learning about gender neutrality at 24. He now identifies as “they” and feels more confident in expressing themselves. [Transition to a problem] Although progress is visible, there are still concerns, especially in workplace socialization. Joshua Byron still feels uncomfortable being referred to as “they” at work.
[Topic Sentence – Argument 3: Workplaces are lagging behind in inclusivity]
Many employers don’t know how to handle and deal with non-binary people. [Support/Evidence] Transgender people are still non-inclusive in a majority of the workplaces, and no documented progress exists so far. Many job applications only include two sections, male or female, neglecting non-binary identities. Additionally, bathrooms are a hotspot of controversy or even violence, and non-binary people are often most uncomfortable there. [Expert Reference] Reform in social structure is necessary, as public policy scholar Jody Herman thinks that gender nonconformity is growing in the younger generation.
[Topic Sentence – Argument 4: Awareness and reform are already underway]
Jacob, a non-binary person, feels that employers must be educated on how to handle transgender individuals or those who prefer not to disclose their gender. Most people treat non-binary individuals like aliens, asking invasive questions and demanding unnecessary explanations. Jacob now mentors others who struggle with these new norms. Meanwhile, several organizations are moving in the right direction. [Support/Evidence] An airline named United Airlines now allows customers to book their tickets as non-binary. A retirement company, TIAA, permits representatives to introduce themselves with their preferred pronouns. A law firm, Baker McKenzie, even allows 20% of their workforce to identify with non-confirmatory gender identities. [Counterargument + Rebuttal] Some critics argue that these changes conflict with long-standing cultural values and are difficult to adjust to. However, such resistance is a natural part of social evolution, and over time, new norms tend to be accepted as society progresses. What is seen as “nonadjustable” today could become the foundation of a more inclusive tomorrow.
[Conclusion – Restating Thesis]
In conclusion, gender neutrality is not just a modern concept—it is a necessary step in the ongoing evolution of society. As cultures continue to develop, so must our institutions and attitudes toward identity and inclusion. Embracing gender-neutral practices is essential for creating a world that respects and validates everyone, regardless of how they identify.
Analysis of Argumentative Essay Example 2
The argument in this article is strong and clear: gender neutrality should be a part of society’s cultural growth. The thesis is based right away on the more general themes of justice and acceptance, and it starts with an important historical setting. The structure is well-thought-out, and each line focuses on a different supporting point, ranging from personal stories and problems at work to new changes to the way institutions work. Stories from real life, like the ones about Joshua Byron and Jacob, help to make the argument more relatable and show how the problem really affects people. Referencing business actions and professional opinions also gives the claims credibility and up-to-dateness.
The essay also backs up its point of view by pointing out a counterargument and expertly arguing against it. This shows that people will always be against change. It’s interesting that personal memories are included, yet occasionally the essay overfits depending on them. Story and real-world data should be better balanced, much as statistics on non-binary job discrimination show. This would strengthen the point. Additionally there is some repetition in the phrasing and transitions that might be corrected to improve the clarity and flow of the work. Still, the tone remains serious and fascinating, and the conclusion supports the thesis and reveals future directions of events.
Argumentative Essay Example 3
Challenging Perceptions Through Cultural Immersion
Introduction examples for argumentative essays
[Introduction & Background] Living in a small city in the United States, I never met any Muslims, nor had I ever seen them walking or visiting famous tourist spots. However, I often heard about them in the news, how barbaric and outdated they are. A couple of months ago, I heard in a documentary that Islam is a growing religion in the US, and it alarmed my consciousness and senses. My curiosity to learn more about Islam and Muslims increased. [Thesis Statement] Long story short, I felt that we need to evaluate situations differently, and as the proverb goes, “don’t judge a book by its cover.” And we need to understand people and avoid social profiling in every case.
[Personal Encounter & Initial Bias]
Once I saw a woman covered in a black cloth during the summer season under the scorching heat of the sun. She looked like a threat to my country, culture, and very existence, and she precisely matched the terrorists that I had seen on media streams after 9/11 and other terrorist attacks around the globe on NATO forces and others defending European interest in the Middle East and Asia. I decided to follow her while she was heading towards a private accommodation facility for rent. I am not the type of person who bullies, but while passing by her, I shouted at her, calling by names. But to my surprise, she stopped and responded politely by saying words that changed my perception, and I decided to talk to her and define my perception. Her words were, “you are mistaken.” And she offered to sit with her at her place, but I refused. However, I asked her to meet in a cafe nearby, but she asked me to meet at her community centre.
[Transformation Through Experience]
On Sunday, after attending church, I wanted to meet her, and I drove for an hour to reach her at the nearest community centre, she told me at the end of our first interaction. I thought that she was an ignorant Arab lady with a bunch of kids and a hard-looking, stubbornly tanned face. I reached the community centre and saw her family for the first time, who were all white and waiting to receive me at the door of their community centre. Her husband welcomed me, and she accompanied him. She converted to Islam a couple of years ago. Her father was a professor in a university, and she was an engineer.
[Reconsidering Media and Political Bias]
Her long story made me change my mind and question everything I heard in the media. She was married to a white man, and I became friends with him. I learned how politics is tearing people apart, and in a blink of an eye, humans turn against one another. She told me that it happens almost daily when she has to face such criticism at her workplace, public places, etc., and she often goes through public humiliation. She has two girls, and they go to a private school with other Muslim kids. I came to know that they are all more productive people than the majority of Americans.
[Conclusion & Broader Argument]
Every human is different and often good by heart, be it black, white, brown, Asian, Arab, European, African, rich or poor. And our biases should not overcome our good feelings and peace. Whenever there is a war between two participants, there must be consequences for both. And the damage inflicted on the Muslims is way higher than on the Christians. The entire Middle East is burning, and Asian Muslim countries are also under a constant wave of conflict. There are many reasons for Muslims to hate us, but this won’t reduce conflicts and animosities. I am a devout Christian, and I believe that Jesus taught us to love our neighbour and do good deeds. Muslims are also devout and pray to the same God as we do and believe in peace. And a majority is willing for these conflicts to end and wants to be at peace. However, there is an exception for politicians and criminals that are in abundance on both sides of the conflict. We should not disturb our relations or build biases based on political propaganda and ongoing conflicts. And appreciating our differences is the only way we can peacefully coexist and grow together.
Analysis of Argumentative Essay Example 3
This essay presents a personal perspective based analysis of how a cultural immersion program might help people to reconsider their basic prejudices and assumptions. The author begins by noting that growing up in a tiny American city, she had not much experience with Muslims.This provides the foundation for the internal conflict brought on by media conjecture. The author uses an emotional exchange with a Muslim woman to show how quickly bias can turn into understanding and kindness. The woman’s honest and kind answer shows how important it is for us to talk to each other and clear up any confusion. The essay goes smoothly from a personal story to a broader view of society. It shows how politics and the media can divide people, but polite speech can bring them together.
The organization of the essay could have been improved, and it could have been clearer. It’s really genuine, which is awesome, but there are a few points that come up more than once, and sometimes the ideas mix together without a clear conclusion. The ending raises a bunch of complex geopolitical issues that might require deeper exploration or could be postponed for later discussion. There are also differences in language between personal accounts and broader generalizations. It might be helpful to provide more evidence or to clearly separate facts from opinions. Even with these problems, the essay offers a thoughtful and honest perspective on the author’s personal growth. It also highlights the importance of understanding, empathy, and pushing back against the divisiveness created by the media.